Mohan -v- Ireland & Anor [2016] IEHC 35 (02 February 2016)

Mohan -v- Ireland & Anor [2016] IEHC 35 (02 February 2016)

Section 17(4B) of the Electoral Act 1997 is constitutionally valid. The provision is gender-neutral, does not infringe individual eligibility for election, and constitutes a legitimate regulatory measure to address gender imbalance in parliamentary representation. The plaintiff failed to establish standing or factual basis for coercion or exclusion attributable to the statutory provision rather than party discretion.

Citation
[2016] IEHC 35
Parties
Plaintiff: Brian Mohan; Defendant: Ireland; Defendant: Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
02 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Challenge / Final Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Gender Quotas, Political Party Funding, Equality Before the Law, Freedom of Association, Electoral Candidate Selection
Constitutional Law Electoral Law Equality Law Gender Quotas Political Party Funding Equality Before the Law Freedom of Association Electoral Candidate Selection

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brian Mohan

Plaintiff

Ireland

Defendant

Attorney General

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Challenge / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether s. 17(4B) of the Electoral Act 1997, as amended, is repugnant to the Constitution
  2. 2 Whether the statutory gender quota infringes constitutional rights to equality, freedom of association, and eligibility for election
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff has standing to challenge the provision

Ratio Decidendi

Section 17(4B) of the Electoral Act 1997 is constitutionally valid. The provision is gender-neutral, does not infringe individual eligibility for election, and constitutes a legitimate regulatory measure to address gender imbalance in parliamentary representation. The plaintiff failed to establish standing or factual basis for coercion or exclusion attributable to the statutory provision rather than party discretion.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim dismissed

Orders

  • Declaration that s. 17(4B) of the Electoral Act 1997 is not repugnant to the Constitution
  • No order as to costs