Bulrush Horticulture Ltd. v An Bord Pleanala & ors; Westland Horticulture Ltd. & ors-v- An Bord Pleanala & ors [2018] IEHC 808 (07 December 2018)
The court found that while the decision had far-reaching implications for the peat industry, there was no sufficient uncertainty in the law to warrant certification for appeal. The relevant legislation and case law were clear, and the applicants' arguments did not meet the statutory threshold for exceptional public importance and uncertainty.
- Citation
- [2018] IEHC 808
- Parties
- Applicant: Bulrush Horticulture Ltd.; Applicant: Westland Horticulture Ltd.; Applicant: Westmeath Peat Limited; Applicant: Cavan Peat Limited; Respondent: An Bord Pleanála; Notice Party: Westmeath County Council; Notice Party: Friends of the Irish Environment; Notice Party: Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Certificate to Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- application for certificate to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Exempted Development, Environmental Impact Assessment, Peat Extraction, Interpretation of EU Directives, Certification for Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bulrush Horticulture Ltd.
Applicant
Westland Horticulture Ltd.
Applicant
Westmeath Peat Limited
Applicant
Cavan Peat Limited
Applicant
An Bord Pleanála
Respondent
Westmeath County Council
Notice Party
Friends of the Irish Environment
Notice Party
Friends of the Irish Environment Ltd.
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Certificate to Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the continuation of peat extraction on lands previously exempted is subject to EIA and Habitats Directive requirements
- 2 Whether peat extraction not involving a new or extended area can be sub-threshold development requiring EIA
- 3 Whether EIA/Habitats Directive apply to projects commenced as exempted development prior to transposition
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the decision had far-reaching implications for the peat industry, there was no sufficient uncertainty in the law to warrant certification for appeal. The relevant legislation and case law were clear, and the applicants' arguments did not meet the statutory threshold for exceptional public importance and uncertainty.
Court Disposition
application for certificate to appeal refused
Orders
- Certificate for leave to appeal not granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment