C.N. v T.N. (disclosure; vouching) (Approved) [2025] IEHC 712 (04 November 2025)
The Respondent has failed to comply with the mandatory requirement to vouch his Affidavit of Means within the prescribed period, and the absence of legal representation does not justify indefinite delay. The court grants a final 12-week period for compliance, after which the motion to strike out will be determined.
- Citation
- [2025] IEHC 712
- Parties
- Applicant: C. N.; Respondent: T. N.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law (divorce) / Interlocutory Motion to Strike Out Replying Affidavit and Counterclaim for Failure to Vouch Affidavit of Means
- Outcome
- Adjourned with directions
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Affidavit of Means, Vouching, Procedural Compliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C. N.
Applicant
T. N.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law (divorce) / Interlocutory Motion to Strike Out Replying Affidavit and Counterclaim for Failure to Vouch Affidavit of Means
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent's replying affidavit and counterclaim should be struck out for failure to vouch his Affidavit of Means as required by court rules
Ratio Decidendi
The Respondent has failed to comply with the mandatory requirement to vouch his Affidavit of Means within the prescribed period, and the absence of legal representation does not justify indefinite delay. The court grants a final 12-week period for compliance, after which the motion to strike out will be determined.
Court Disposition
Adjourned with directions
Orders
- Respondent is allowed 12 weeks (until 26 January 2026) to provide vouching for his Affidavit of Means.
- Motion to strike out is adjourned for hearing to 9 February 2026.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment