W. (C.) v. W. (L.) [2005] IEHC 325 (23 February 2005)
The testator, credited with objective knowledge of the likely distribution of his estate and the applicant's future inheritance from her mother, did not make sufficient provision for the applicant's security of income after her mother's estate is distributed. A prudent parent would have ensured greater security for the applicant, given her circumstances.
- Citation
- [2005] IEHC 325
- Parties
- Applicant: C. W.; Respondent: L. W.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 23 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Section 117 Application Under the Succession Act, 1965 / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Moral Duty of Testator, Provision for Children, Section 117 Succession Act 1965, Testamentary Capacity, Valuation of Estate
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C. W.
Applicant
L. W.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Section 117 Application Under the Succession Act, 1965 / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the testator failed in his moral duty to make proper provision for the applicant under Section 117 of the Succession Act, 1965
- 2 Whether the applicant's likely inheritance from her mother's estate should be considered in assessing the testator's moral duty
Ratio Decidendi
The testator, credited with objective knowledge of the likely distribution of his estate and the applicant's future inheritance from her mother, did not make sufficient provision for the applicant's security of income after her mother's estate is distributed. A prudent parent would have ensured greater security for the applicant, given her circumstances.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- Court to make an order providing for an additional income of €12,000 per annum for the applicant after distribution of her mother's estate, with the precise mechanism to be determined after further submissions from counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment