Coleman -v- Mullen [2011] IEHC 179 (03 May 2011)

Coleman -v- Mullen [2011] IEHC 179 (03 May 2011)

In the absence of any intention to create legal relations, and where services were rendered voluntarily out of friendship and neighbourliness, the law does not impose an obligation on the estate to pay the plaintiff on a quantum meruit basis.

Citation
[2011] IEHC 179
Parties
Plaintiff: Catherine Coleman; Defendant: Frank Mullen
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
03 May 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Circuit Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; Circuit Court award set aside.
Legal Topics
Quantum Meruit, Unjust Enrichment, Intention to Create Legal Relations, Voluntary Services, Succession
Contract Law Restitution Quantum Meruit Unjust Enrichment Intention to Create Legal Relations Voluntary Services Succession

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Catherine Coleman

Plaintiff

Frank Mullen

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Circuit Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether voluntary services rendered by the plaintiff to the deceased entitle her to a quantum meruit claim against the estate in the absence of an intention to create legal relations.

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of any intention to create legal relations, and where services were rendered voluntarily out of friendship and neighbourliness, the law does not impose an obligation on the estate to pay the plaintiff on a quantum meruit basis.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; Circuit Court award set aside.

Orders

  • The defendant's appeal is allowed.
  • The award of €25,000 to the plaintiff is set aside.