Charities Regulatory Authority v Ellard (Approved) (Rev1) [2024] IEHC 251 (26 April 2024)
Section 65(2) of the Charities Act 2009 does not require prior notification to third parties before an inspector can exercise statutory powers. The only precondition is that the inspector considers the person may be in possession of relevant information. The District Judge's interpretation imposing a notification...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] IEHC 251
- Parties
- Applicant: Charities Regulatory Authority; Respondent: David Ellard
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court Determination
- Outcome
- District Court's acquittal reversed; matter remitted for fresh hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Powers of Inspectors, Failure to Comply With Statutory Requirements, Interpretation of Charities Act 2009, Fiduciary Duties, Constitutional Protections
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charities Regulatory Authority
Applicant
David Ellard
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.65(2) of the Charities Act 2009 requires prior notification to third parties before statutory demands can be made
- 2 Whether an inspector must be satisfied in advance that a person can access requested documents before imposing a requirement
- 3 Whether failure to comply with a statutory requirement is criminalised absent prior notification
Ratio Decidendi
Section 65(2) of the Charities Act 2009 does not require prior notification to third parties before an inspector can exercise statutory powers. The only precondition is that the inspector considers the person may be in possession of relevant information. The District Judge's interpretation imposing a notification requirement and limiting inspector powers was incorrect and unsupported by statutory language or legal principles.
Court Disposition
District Court's acquittal reversed; matter remitted for fresh hearing.
Orders
- District Judge's interpretation of s.65(2) incorrect
- District Court determination reversed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment