McLaughlin v Dealey & Anor (Approved) [2023] IEHC 106 (07 March 2023)
The plaintiff is entitled to damages for persistent lower back pain resulting from a workplace accident, with expert evidence from a consultant orthopaedic surgeon directly engaged by her solicitor accepted as objective and reliable. Loss of opportunity to pursue nursing is not a strong factor in damages absent evidence of financial loss.
- Citation
- [2023] IEHC 106
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Charlena McLaughlin; Defendant: David Dealey; Defendant: Health Service Executive
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Assessment of Damages Following Admission of Liability
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff against Health Service Executive
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Expert Evidence, Loss of Opportunity, Soft Tissue Injury
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charlena McLaughlin
Plaintiff
David Dealey
Defendant
Health Service Executive
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Assessment of Damages Following Admission of Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate damages for persistent soft tissue injury
- 2 Weight to be attached to expert evidence directly engaged by solicitor
- 3 Loss of opportunity claim for change of career
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff is entitled to damages for persistent lower back pain resulting from a workplace accident, with expert evidence from a consultant orthopaedic surgeon directly engaged by her solicitor accepted as objective and reliable. Loss of opportunity to pursue nursing is not a strong factor in damages absent evidence of financial loss.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff against Health Service Executive
Orders
- Total award of damages in favour of plaintiff in the sum of €60,272
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment