R -v- R [2006] IESC 7 (16 February 2006)

R -v- R [2006] IESC 7 (16 February 2006)

The trial judge's findings that the father did not consent to permanent relocation, did not acquiesce, and that no grave risk was established, were supported by credible evidence and are binding; the minors' habitual residence remained in the USA; the appeal is dismissed and the minors must be returned.

Citation
[2006] IESC 7
Parties
Applicant/respondent: S. R.; Respondent/appellant: M. M. R.
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
16 February 2006
Procedural Posture
Child Abduction Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed
Legal Topics
Child Abduction, Custody, Habitual Residence, Consent, Acquiescence, Grave Risk, Undertakings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

S. R.

Applicant/respondent

M. M. R.

Respondent/appellant

Procedural Posture

Child Abduction Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 whether the father consented to the permanent relocation of the minors to Ireland
  2. 2 whether the minors' habitual residence was altered
  3. 3 whether the father acquiesced in the retention of the minors in Ireland

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge's findings that the father did not consent to permanent relocation, did not acquiesce, and that no grave risk was established, were supported by credible evidence and are binding; the minors' habitual residence remained in the USA; the appeal is dismissed and the minors must be returned.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed

Orders

  • minors to be returned to the jurisdiction of the State of M., U. S. A.
  • father to vacate family home pending any order of M., U. S. A. courts and permit mother to reside there with minors