Director of Public Prosecutions -v- McCarthy [2016] IECA 254 (22 July 2016)
The original sentence was a significant and substantial departure from the appropriate sentence for malicious damage, given the appellant's circumstances and record. The sentence was set aside and replaced with a three-year imprisonment term, with the final twelve months suspended subject to conditions protecting...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] IECA 254
- Parties
- Respondent: Director of Public Prosecutions; Appellant: Christopher McCarthy
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence varied
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Malicious Damage, Obstruction of Police, Suspended Sentence, Proportionality
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Respondent
Christopher McCarthy
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the original sentence disproportionate for the offence of malicious damage?
- 2 Did the trial judge err in placing the offence near the top range of penalties?
- 3 Should conditions be imposed on any suspended sentence?
Ratio Decidendi
The original sentence was a significant and substantial departure from the appropriate sentence for malicious damage, given the appellant's circumstances and record. The sentence was set aside and replaced with a three-year imprisonment term, with the final twelve months suspended subject to conditions protecting the injured party.
Court Disposition
sentence varied
Orders
- Original sentence set aside.
- Three years imprisonment imposed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment