Culkin -v- Sligo County Council [2015] IEHC 46 (06 February 2015)

Culkin -v- Sligo County Council [2015] IEHC 46 (06 February 2015)

The plaintiff is precluded from pursuing personal injuries proceedings in the High Court due to the overlap with Equality Tribunal proceedings, as established by the rule in Henderson v. Henderson and s.101(2)(a) of the Employment Equality Act. The plaintiff elected to pursue the statutory remedy and is estopped from resiling after rejection by the Tribunal.

Citation
[2015] IEHC 46
Parties
Plaintiff: Ciaran Culkin; Defendant: Sligo County Council
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
06 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Personal Injuries Summons / Application to Strike Out Proceedings
Outcome
Plaintiff's personal injuries claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Duplication of Proceedings, Statutory Interpretation, Constructive Dismissal, Bullying and Harassment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ciaran Culkin

Plaintiff

Sligo County Council

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injuries Summons / Application to Strike Out Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is precluded from pursuing personal injuries proceedings in the High Court due to prior Equality Tribunal proceedings under s.101(2)(a) of the Employment Equality Act
  2. 2 Whether the rule in Henderson v. Henderson applies to prevent duplication of proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff is precluded from pursuing personal injuries proceedings in the High Court due to the overlap with Equality Tribunal proceedings, as established by the rule in Henderson v. Henderson and s.101(2)(a) of the Employment Equality Act. The plaintiff elected to pursue the statutory remedy and is estopped from resiling after rejection by the Tribunal.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's personal injuries claim dismissed

Orders

  • Plaintiff's personal injuries proceedings are struck out