Clúid Housing Association -v- O'Brien & ors [2015] IEHC 398 (30 June 2015)
The respondent did not serve the third party notice as soon as reasonably possible as required by s.27(1)(b) Civil Liability Act 1961, given its knowledge of the facts, expertise, and the detailed statement of claim; the explanations for delay were not substantiated; the applicant acted reasonably in seeking to set aside the notice.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 398
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Clúid Housing Association; Defendant: Brian O’Brien and Michael Haslam practicing under the style and title of Solearth Ecological Architecture; Defendant/respondent: Remco Limited trading as Malone O’Regan Consulting Engineers; Defendant: P. Elliot & Company Limited (in Receivership and Liquidation); Third Party/applicant: DTE Manufacturing Limited trading as Dempsey Timber Engineering
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Third Party Notice in Civil Proceedings / High Court Judgment on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application granted; third party proceedings set aside
- Legal Topics
- Third Party Procedure, Professional Negligence, Limitation Periods, Joinder of Parties, Contribution and Indemnity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clúid Housing Association
Plaintiff
Brian O’Brien and Michael Haslam practicing under the style and title of Solearth Ecological Architecture
Defendant
Remco Limited trading as Malone O’Regan Consulting Engineers
Defendant/respondent
P. Elliot & Company Limited (in Receivership and Liquidation)
Defendant
DTE Manufacturing Limited trading as Dempsey Timber Engineering
Third Party/applicant
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Third Party Notice in Civil Proceedings / High Court Judgment on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the third party notice was served as soon as reasonably possible under s.27(1)(b) Civil Liability Act 1961
- 2 Whether delay in issuing and serving the third party notice was justified in the circumstances
- 3 Whether the applicant acted as soon as reasonably possible in seeking to set aside the third party notice
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent did not serve the third party notice as soon as reasonably possible as required by s.27(1)(b) Civil Liability Act 1961, given its knowledge of the facts, expertise, and the detailed statement of claim; the explanations for delay were not substantiated; the applicant acted reasonably in seeking to set aside the notice.
Court Disposition
Application granted; third party proceedings set aside
Orders
- The third party proceedings brought by the third named defendant/respondent are set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment