Clonres CLG v The Minister for Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht & ors (Approved) [2020] IEHC 353 (16 July 2020)
Clonres' proceedings are out of time as they challenge the Minister's non-designation of St. Paul's site as an SPA, which occurred in 2009/2010 or was confirmed in August 2018. No good and sufficient reason was provided for the delay, and the circumstances leading to the delay were not outside Clonres' control. The Minister is not under a continuing obligation exempt from time limits. Extension of time is refused.
- Citation
- [2020] IEHC 353
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Clonres Ltd.; First Defendant: Minister for Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht; Second and Third Defendants: State Defendants; Fourth Defendant: Crekav
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Plenary Proceedings (public Law/judicial Review in Substance) / High Court Judgment on Motion to Strike Out and Application to Extend Time
- Outcome
- Claim struck out as out of time; extension of time refused.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Time Limits, Mandamus, Special Protection Areas (spa), Birds Directive, Planning Permission, Extension of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clonres Ltd.
Plaintiff
Minister for Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht
First Defendant
State Defendants
Second and Third Defendants
Crekav
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Plenary Proceedings (public Law/judicial Review in Substance) / High Court Judgment on Motion to Strike Out and Application to Extend Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Clonres' proceedings challenging the Minister's failure to designate St. Paul's site as an SPA are out of time under Order 84, rule 21(1)
- 2 Whether the Minister is under a continuing obligation to designate SPAs exempt from time limits
- 3 Whether Clonres is entitled to an extension of time to bring proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
Clonres' proceedings are out of time as they challenge the Minister's non-designation of St. Paul's site as an SPA, which occurred in 2009/2010 or was confirmed in August 2018. No good and sufficient reason was provided for the delay, and the circumstances leading to the delay were not outside Clonres' control. The Minister is not under a continuing obligation exempt from time limits. Extension of time is refused.
Court Disposition
Claim struck out as out of time; extension of time refused.
Orders
- Proceedings against the State Defendants dismissed.
- Application to amend Plenary Summons and Statement of Claim refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment