O'Connell v. Environmental Protection Agency [2002] IEHC 46 (25 April 2002)

O'Connell v. Environmental Protection Agency [2002] IEHC 46 (25 April 2002)

The EPA was not required to carry out an EIA as the project was below the relevant threshold and the competent authority (An Bord Pleanála) had determined that an EIA was not mandatory. Section 98 of the 1992 Act does not prevent the planning authority from considering the need for an EIA at the appropriate stage....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2002] IEHC 46
Parties
Applicant: Collette O’Connell; Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency; Notice Party: Thesio Limited; Notice Party: Ireland and the Attorney General
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
25 April 2002
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Environmental Impact Assessment, Integrated Pollution Control Licence, Project Splitting, Compliance With EU Directives, Planning and Development Regulations
Environmental Law Administrative Law European Union Law Environmental Impact Assessment Integrated Pollution Control Licence Project Splitting Compliance With EU Directives Planning and Development Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Collette O’Connell

Applicant

Environmental Protection Agency

Respondent

Thesio Limited

Notice Party

Ireland and the Attorney General

Notice Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Environmental Protection Agency was required to carry out an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) before granting an Integrated Pollution Control (IPC) Licence
  2. 2 Whether section 98 of the Environmental Protection Agency Act, 1992 is inconsistent with European law
  3. 3 Whether the application failed to comply with licensing regulations due to insufficient detail

Ratio Decidendi

The EPA was not required to carry out an EIA as the project was below the relevant threshold and the competent authority (An Bord Pleanála) had determined that an EIA was not mandatory. Section 98 of the 1992 Act does not prevent the planning authority from considering the need for an EIA at the appropriate stage. The EPA complied with all relevant legal obligations, and the application met regulatory requirements.

Court Disposition

Application refused