Murphy v. British Broadcasting Corporation [2004] IEHC 420 (21 December 2004)

Murphy v. British Broadcasting Corporation [2004] IEHC 420 (21 December 2004)

The BBC is not estopped by the Special Criminal Court's decision from contesting locus standi, as issue estoppel does not apply in these circumstances. However, by reason of its conduct and representations before the Special Criminal Court, it would be an abuse of process to allow the BBC to now contest Mr. Murphy's standing in the High Court. The applicant has locus standi to bring these contempt proceedings. On the issue of jury trial, the right arises only if there are real and live issues of fact; the determination of whether such issues exist must await the substantive hearing.

Citation
[2004] IEHC 420
Parties
Applicant: Colm Murphy; Respondent: British Broadcasting Corporation; Notice Party: Director of Public Prosecutions
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
21 December 2004
Procedural Posture
Motion for Contempt (preliminary Issues) / High Court Preliminary Determination on Locus Standi and Jury Entitlement
Outcome
Applicant succeeds on locus standi; respondent not estopped but precluded by abuse of process from contesting standing; entitlement to jury trial to be determined at substantive hearing if real and live issues of fact exist.
Legal Topics
Locus Standi, Issue Estoppel, Abuse of Process, Right to Jury Trial, Contempt Proceedings, Freedom of Expression
Criminal Law Constitutional Law Media Law Contempt of Court Locus Standi Issue Estoppel Abuse of Process Right to Jury Trial +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 39 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Colm Murphy

Applicant

British Broadcasting Corporation

Respondent

Director of Public Prosecutions

Notice Party

Procedural Posture

Motion for Contempt (preliminary Issues) / High Court Preliminary Determination on Locus Standi and Jury Entitlement

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the BBC is estopped from contesting the applicant's locus standi in the High Court by reason of the Special Criminal Court's decision or its own conduct
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has locus standi to bring contempt proceedings in the High Court
  3. 3 Whether the respondent is entitled to a jury trial on the contempt application

Ratio Decidendi

The BBC is not estopped by the Special Criminal Court's decision from contesting locus standi, as issue estoppel does not apply in these circumstances. However, by reason of its conduct and representations before the Special Criminal Court, it would be an abuse of process to allow the BBC to now contest Mr. Murphy's standing in the High Court. The applicant has locus standi to bring these contempt proceedings. On the issue of jury trial, the right arises only if there are real and live issues of fact; the determination of whether such issues exist must await the substantive hearing.

Court Disposition

Applicant succeeds on locus standi; respondent not estopped but precluded by abuse of process from contesting standing; entitlement to jury trial to be determined at substantive hearing if real and live issues of fact exist.

Orders

  • The BBC is precluded from contesting the applicant's locus standi in these proceedings.
  • The applicant has locus standi to bring the contempt motion in the High Court.