Right to Know CLG v Commissioner for Environmental Information (Approved) [2022] IECA 210 (21 September 2022)
RPD is not a public authority under the AIE Regulations or Directive 2003/4/EC. The generation of electricity by RPD is not a service of public interest entrusted by national law, nor is RPD vested with special powers beyond normal private law. RPD operates in a competitive market, is not subject to public service obligations, and its licence does not confer public authority status. The identity of shareholders is irrelevant to category (b); control by ESB is insufficient for category (c) as RPD acts autonomously. The High Court erred in law by finding RPD to be a public authority; the appeal is allowed.
- Citation
- [2022] IECA 210
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: Right to Know CLG; Respondent: Commissioner for Environmental Information; Notice Party/appellant: Raheenleagh Power DAC
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 21 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court decision overturned.
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Public Authority, Access to Environmental Information, Aarhus Convention, Directive 2003/4/ec, Electricity Regulation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Right to Know CLG
Applicant/respondent
Commissioner for Environmental Information
Respondent
Raheenleagh Power DAC
Notice Party/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Is Raheenleagh Power DAC a public authority under the AIE Regulations and Directive 2003/4/EC?
- 2 Was RPD entrusted with the performance of services of public interest?
- 3 Does RPD enjoy special powers under national law?
Ratio Decidendi
RPD is not a public authority under the AIE Regulations or Directive 2003/4/EC. The generation of electricity by RPD is not a service of public interest entrusted by national law, nor is RPD vested with special powers beyond normal private law. RPD operates in a competitive market, is not subject to public service obligations, and its licence does not confer public authority status. The identity of shareholders is irrelevant to category (b); control by ESB is insufficient for category (c) as RPD acts autonomously. The High Court erred in law by finding RPD to be a public authority; the appeal is allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court decision overturned.
Orders
- RPD is not a public authority within the meaning of the AIE Regulations or Directive 2003/4/EC.
- No remittal to the Commissioner; no reference to the CJEU required.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment