Comptroller and Auditor General v. Ireland [1996] IEHC 49; [1997] 1 IR 248 (20th December, 1996)
Section 7(5) of the Amnesty Act restricts the Comptroller and Auditor General to using information acquired from special collectors solely for the purpose of ensuring special collection functions have been discharged in accordance with the Act. The 'Provided that' segment is a saving clause, not a proviso, and does not broaden the Plaintiff's audit powers beyond this self-contained audit. This restriction does not violate Article 33 of the Constitution, as it does not diminish the Plaintiff's general audit powers but merely precludes the use of confidential information for purposes outside the legislative scheme of the tax amnesty.
- Citation
- [1996] IEHC 49
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Comptroller and Auditor General; Defendants: Revenue Commissioners and Chief Special Collector
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional/statutory Interpretation / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claims dismissed; Section 7(5) upheld as valid.
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Constitutional Validity, Audit Powers, Tax Amnesty, Confidentiality of Taxpayer Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Comptroller and Auditor General
Plaintiff
Revenue Commissioners and Chief Special Collector
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Constitutional/statutory Interpretation / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of Section 7(5) of the Waiver of Certain Tax, Interest and Penalties Act, 1993 (Amnesty Act)
- 2 Whether Section 7(5) is invalid having regard to Article 33 of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
Section 7(5) of the Amnesty Act restricts the Comptroller and Auditor General to using information acquired from special collectors solely for the purpose of ensuring special collection functions have been discharged in accordance with the Act. The 'Provided that' segment is a saving clause, not a proviso, and does not broaden the Plaintiff's audit powers beyond this self-contained audit. This restriction does not violate Article 33 of the Constitution, as it does not diminish the Plaintiff's general audit powers but merely precludes the use of confidential information for purposes outside the legislative scheme of the tax amnesty.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claims dismissed; Section 7(5) upheld as valid.
Orders
- Section 7(5) of the Waiver of Certain Tax, Interest and Penalties Act, 1993 is not invalid having regard to Article 33 of the Constitution.
- The Comptroller and Auditor General is restricted to using information from special collectors solely for ensuring special collection functions were discharged in accordance with the Act.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment