Martin v O'Keeffe & Anor (Approved) [2025] IEHC 272 (14 May 2025)
The lis pendens must be vacated under section 123(a)(i) because the proceedings have been finally determined, the Plaintiff failed to exercise the option to purchase for €725,000, and maintaining the lis pendens beyond determination is unjust and legally vulnerable.
- Citation
- [2025] IEHC 272
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Conor Martin; Defendant: Ray O'Keeffe; Defendant: Etna O'Keeffe
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Motion to Vacate Lis Pendens / Post Judgment, Determination of Lis Pendens
- Outcome
- Order granted to vacate lis pendens; Plaintiff provisionally liable for costs.
- Legal Topics
- Lis Pendens, Specific Performance, Delay in Prosecution, Land Conveyancing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Conor Martin
Plaintiff
Ray O'Keeffe
Defendant
Etna O'Keeffe
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Motion to Vacate Lis Pendens / Post Judgment, Determination of Lis Pendens
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether lis pendens should be vacated after determination of proceedings
- 2 Whether there was unreasonable delay in prosecuting the action
- 3 Whether Plaintiff validly exercised option to purchase property
Ratio Decidendi
The lis pendens must be vacated under section 123(a)(i) because the proceedings have been finally determined, the Plaintiff failed to exercise the option to purchase for €725,000, and maintaining the lis pendens beyond determination is unjust and legally vulnerable.
Court Disposition
Order granted to vacate lis pendens; Plaintiff provisionally liable for costs.
Orders
- Lis pendens registered by Plaintiff to be vacated.
- Matter listed for hearing on costs at 11am on 22 May 2025.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment