The Collector General of behalf of the Minister for Finance -v- P O'M [2015] IEHC 718 (20 November 2015)
No enforceable agreement existed waiving the interest due, as there was no consideration provided by the debtor. The sum claimed in the bankruptcy summons was less than the debtor's total indebtedness at the relevant time. The debtor's failure to pay constituted an act of bankruptcy, entitling the petitioner to seek adjudication. The application to extend time to dismiss the bankruptcy summons was refused as no good grounds were advanced, and the debtor was not prejudiced as he could raise his arguments in defence to the petition.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 718
- Parties
- Petitioner: Michael Gladney, Collector General of the Revenue Commissioners on behalf of the Minister for Finance, for the benefit of the Central Fund; Debtor: P. O'M.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Judgment on Petition and Related Applications
- Outcome
- Application to extend time to dismiss bankruptcy summons refused; application to dismiss bankruptcy summons refused; petition not dismissed; petition adjourned for debtor to submit statement of affairs and letter from Personal Insolvency Practitioner.
- Legal Topics
- Consideration in Debt Agreements, Estoppel, Act of Bankruptcy, Application to Dismiss Bankruptcy Summons, Calculation of Debt and Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Gladney, Collector General of the Revenue Commissioners on behalf of the Minister for Finance, for the benefit of the Central Fund
Petitioner
P. O'M.
Debtor
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Judgment on Petition and Related Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the debtor committed an act of bankruptcy by failing to pay the sum claimed in the bankruptcy summons
- 2 Whether agreements between the parties (2003 and alleged 2007) were enforceable and affected the debt
- 3 Whether the sum claimed was overstated and invalidated the bankruptcy summons
Ratio Decidendi
No enforceable agreement existed waiving the interest due, as there was no consideration provided by the debtor. The sum claimed in the bankruptcy summons was less than the debtor's total indebtedness at the relevant time. The debtor's failure to pay constituted an act of bankruptcy, entitling the petitioner to seek adjudication. The application to extend time to dismiss the bankruptcy summons was refused as no good grounds were advanced, and the debtor was not prejudiced as he could raise his arguments in defence to the petition.
Court Disposition
Application to extend time to dismiss bankruptcy summons refused; application to dismiss bankruptcy summons refused; petition not dismissed; petition adjourned for debtor to submit statement of affairs and letter from Personal Insolvency Practitioner.
Orders
- Application to extend time to apply to dismiss bankruptcy summons refused.
- Application to dismiss bankruptcy summons refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment