D.P.P. (Statford) v. O'Neill [1997] IEHC 152; [1998] 2 IR 383; [1998] 1 ILRM 221 (24th September, 1997)
The District Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the constitutionality of pre-1937 laws directly, but must uphold the Constitution in proceedings before it. Section 5(1) of the 1884 Act is consistent with constitutional principles and has been carried over under Article 50. The provision does not infringe the accused's constitutional rights and is directed at ensuring informed consent for summary trial of young persons.
- Citation
- [1998] 1 ILRM 221
- Parties
- Accused: The Accused; Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Consultative Case Stated / High Court Opinion on Questions of Law
- Outcome
- All questions answered in the affirmative.
- Legal Topics
- Constitutionality of Pre 1937 Laws, Jurisdiction of District Court, Summary Trial of Young Persons, Application of Article 50 of the Constitution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Accused
Accused
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
Procedural Posture
Consultative Case Stated / High Court Opinion on Questions of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a District Judge can refer a consultative case stated to the High Court regarding the constitutionality of a pre-1937 law
- 2 Whether a District Judge has jurisdiction to entertain a constitutional challenge to a pre-1937 statute
- 3 Whether Section 5(1) of the Summary Jurisdiction over Children (Ireland) Act, 1884 has been carried over under Article 50 of the Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
The District Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the constitutionality of pre-1937 laws directly, but must uphold the Constitution in proceedings before it. Section 5(1) of the 1884 Act is consistent with constitutional principles and has been carried over under Article 50. The provision does not infringe the accused's constitutional rights and is directed at ensuring informed consent for summary trial of young persons.
Court Disposition
All questions answered in the affirmative.
Orders
- The District Judge's questions are answered in the affirmative.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment