Keith Harrison v Peter Charleton (Approved) [2020] IECA 197 (23 July 2020)

Keith Harrison v Peter Charleton (Approved) [2020] IECA 197 (23 July 2020)

Respondent is entitled to costs as the entirely successful party; appellant's submissions do not establish special reasons to depart from the normal rule.

Citation
[2020] IECA 197
Parties
Applicant/appellant: Keith Harrison; Respondent/respondent: Peter Charleton
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
23 July 2020
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Post Judgment Costs Ruling
Outcome
Costs awarded to respondent for appeal and High Court proceedings.
Legal Topics
Costs, Judicial Review, Duty of Candour
Civil Procedure Costs Judicial Review Duty of Candour

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Keith Harrison

Applicant/appellant

Peter Charleton

Respondent/respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Appeal / Post Judgment Costs Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether costs should be awarded to the respondent following dismissal of the appeal
  2. 2 Whether alleged nondisclosure by the respondent justifies departure from the normal costs rule

Ratio Decidendi

Respondent is entitled to costs as the entirely successful party; appellant's submissions do not establish special reasons to depart from the normal rule.

Court Disposition

Costs awarded to respondent for appeal and High Court proceedings.

Orders

  • Respondent awarded costs of appeal and High Court proceedings