Keaney v Sullivan & Ors (Approved) [2021] IESC 43 (16 July 2021)
All issues in the proceedings have been finally determined against Mr. Keaney; there is no basis to depart from normal practice that costs follow the event and lis pendens must be vacated.
- Citation
- [2021] IESC 43
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Vincent Keaney; First Defendant: James Sullivan; Second Defendant: Joan Sullivan; Third Defendant: St. John Culligan; Fourth Defendant/respondent: Michael Nolan; Fifth Defendant: Titanic Queenstown Trading Company Limited (in liquidation); Sixth Defendant: Magpie International Holding Company Limited (in liquidation); Seventh Defendant: Titanic Queenstown Memorabilia Limited (in liquidation); Eighth Defendant: Allied Irish Banks PLC; Ninth Defendant: Q. E. F. Global Limited; Tenth to Sixteenth Defendants: Roger Duncan, Geoffrey Lewis, David Marsh, Tom Moore, Declan O’Luanaigh, Neil Payne, David Isaacson (carrying on practice under the style and title of Ormsby Rhodes and BKR Ormsby Rhodes); Seventeenth Defendant: Tregan Properties; Eighteenth Defendant/respondent: Julia Nolan
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Post Appeal, Costs and Ancillary Orders
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to fourth and eighteenth defendants/respondents; lis pendens vacated.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Lis Pendens, Vacation of Lis Pendens
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vincent Keaney
Plaintiff/appellant
James Sullivan
First Defendant
Joan Sullivan
Second Defendant
St. John Culligan
Third Defendant
Michael Nolan
Fourth Defendant/respondent
Titanic Queenstown Trading Company Limited (in liquidation)
Fifth Defendant
Magpie International Holding Company Limited (in liquidation)
Sixth Defendant
Titanic Queenstown Memorabilia Limited (in liquidation)
Seventh Defendant
Allied Irish Banks PLC
Eighth Defendant
Q. E. F. Global Limited
Ninth Defendant
Roger Duncan, Geoffrey Lewis, David Marsh, Tom Moore, Declan O’Luanaigh, Neil Payne, David Isaacson (carrying on practice under the style and title of Ormsby Rhodes and BKR Ormsby Rhodes)
Tenth to Sixteenth Defendants
Tregan Properties
Seventeenth Defendant
Julia Nolan
Eighteenth Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Post Appeal, Costs and Ancillary Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether costs should be awarded to fourth and eighteenth defendants/respondents
- 2 Whether lis pendens should be vacated following final determination of proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
All issues in the proceedings have been finally determined against Mr. Keaney; there is no basis to depart from normal practice that costs follow the event and lis pendens must be vacated.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to fourth and eighteenth defendants/respondents; lis pendens vacated.
Orders
- Fourth and eighteenth defendants/respondents awarded costs of appeal and affirmation of previous costs orders.
- Lis pendens in question vacated under s.123 Land and Conveyancing Reform Act, 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment