Ulster Bank & ors v McDonagh & ors (Unapproved) [2022] IECA 121 (26 May 2022)
No plausible basis was identified to depart from the general rule that the unsuccessful party bears the costs; the appellants were entirely unsuccessful and their arguments did not justify any exception.
- Citation
- [2022] IECA 121
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Ulster Bank Ireland Limited; Plaintiff/respondent: Paul McCann; Plaintiff/respondent: Patrick Dillon; Defendant/appellant: Brian McDonagh; Defendant/appellant: Kenneth McDonagh; Defendant/appellant: Maurice McDonagh
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Costs Ruling After Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Costs awarded to the respondents
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Appeals, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ulster Bank Ireland Limited
Plaintiff/respondent
Paul McCann
Plaintiff/respondent
Patrick Dillon
Plaintiff/respondent
Brian McDonagh
Defendant/appellant
Kenneth McDonagh
Defendant/appellant
Maurice McDonagh
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Costs Ruling After Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the unsuccessful appellants should bear the respondents’ costs of the proceedings in the Court of Appeal and the High Court
- 2 Whether any grounds exist to depart from the general rule on costs
Ratio Decidendi
No plausible basis was identified to depart from the general rule that the unsuccessful party bears the costs; the appellants were entirely unsuccessful and their arguments did not justify any exception.
Court Disposition
Costs awarded to the respondents
Orders
- Defendants/appellants to pay the respondents’ costs of the proceedings in the Court of Appeal and the High Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment