Clare County Council v McDonagh & Anor (Approved) [2022] IESC 15 (14 March 2022)

Clare County Council v McDonagh & Anor (Approved) [2022] IESC 15 (14 March 2022)

Defendants/appellants raised important issues of principle and prevailed on appeal; they are entitled to their costs in the Supreme Court, with prior costs orders vacated and costs from interlocutory hearings reserved to the trial judge.

Citation
[2022] IESC 15
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Clare County Council; Defendant/appellant: Bernard McDonagh; Defendant/appellant: Helen McDonagh; Amicus Curiae: Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
14 March 2022
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Ruling on Costs After Appeal
Outcome
Defendants/appellants awarded costs in Supreme Court; prior costs orders vacated; costs from interlocutory hearings reserved to trial judge.
Legal Topics
Costs, Interlocutory Injunctions, Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Clare County Council

Plaintiff/respondent

Bernard McDonagh

Defendant/appellant

Helen McDonagh

Defendant/appellant

Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission

Amicus Curiae

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Ruling on Costs After Appeal

  1. 1 Entitlement to costs following successful appeal against interlocutory injunctions
  2. 2 Reservation of costs from prior proceedings pending trial

Ratio Decidendi

Defendants/appellants raised important issues of principle and prevailed on appeal; they are entitled to their costs in the Supreme Court, with prior costs orders vacated and costs from interlocutory hearings reserved to the trial judge.

Court Disposition

Defendants/appellants awarded costs in Supreme Court; prior costs orders vacated; costs from interlocutory hearings reserved to trial judge.

Orders

  • Defendants/appellants to have their costs in Supreme Court, taxed in default of agreement.
  • No stay on costs order.