O'Callaghan v The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (Unapproved) [2023] IECA 64 (22 March 2023)

O'Callaghan v The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (Unapproved) [2023] IECA 64 (22 March 2023)

The appellant failed to establish sufficient grounds for departing from the default rule that the successful party is entitled to costs. The lack of fault or neutral behaviour by the appellant does not justify relieving him of the costs burden, and the reasonableness of instituting proceedings is not a basis for departing from the statutory costs rule.

Citation
[2023] IECA 64
Parties
Applicant/appellant: Declan O’Callaghan; Respondent/respondent: The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal; Notice Party: Nirvanna Property Holdings Limited
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
22 March 2023
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment Costs Ruling
Outcome
Order for respondent's costs of the appeal
Legal Topics
Costs, Judicial Review, Disciplinary Proceedings
Civil Procedure Costs Judicial Review Disciplinary Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Declan O’Callaghan

Applicant/appellant

The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal

Respondent/respondent

Nirvanna Property Holdings Limited

Notice Party

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Post Judgment Costs Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should be relieved from paying the respondent's costs despite being unsuccessful in the appeal
  2. 2 Interpretation and application of section 169 of the Legal Services Regulation Act 2015 regarding costs

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to establish sufficient grounds for departing from the default rule that the successful party is entitled to costs. The lack of fault or neutral behaviour by the appellant does not justify relieving him of the costs burden, and the reasonableness of instituting proceedings is not a basis for departing from the statutory costs rule.

Court Disposition

Order for respondent's costs of the appeal

Orders

  • Appellant to pay respondent's costs of the appeal