Slattery -v- Friends First [2015] IECA 149 (10 July 2015)
Rectification was warranted because Clause 2.2 was inserted without agreement, Friends First executed the Deed under a unilateral mistake, and Mr. Slattery and his agent were aware of the mistake and engaged in sharp practice. The trial judge's findings were supported by evidence and legal principles. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] IECA 149
- Parties
- Appellant: Dómhnal Slattery; Respondent: Friends First
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Rectification, Unilateral Mistake, Confidentiality, Guarantee, Sharp Practice
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dómhnal Slattery
Appellant
Friends First
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Clause 2.2 of the Deed of Pledge was valid and enforceable
- 2 Whether rectification of the Deed of Pledge was warranted due to unilateral mistake
- 3 Whether the appellant was entitled to declarations affirming Clause 2.2
Ratio Decidendi
Rectification was warranted because Clause 2.2 was inserted without agreement, Friends First executed the Deed under a unilateral mistake, and Mr. Slattery and his agent were aware of the mistake and engaged in sharp practice. The trial judge's findings were supported by evidence and legal principles. The appellant's claim for declaratory relief was properly dismissed, and rectification ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Rectification of the Deed of Pledge by removal of Clause 2.2
- Dismissal of appellant's claim for declaratory relief
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment