D.F. -v- E.M. [2014] IEHC 510 (09 September 2014)
The Irish proceedings are stayed pending the Rhode Island court's determination of whether it has and will assume jurisdiction over the custody, access, and living arrangements of the children, as the jurisdictional question is logically prior and must be resolved before any further substantive hearing in Ireland.
- Citation
- [2014] IEHC 510
- Parties
- Applicant: D. F.; Respondent: E. M.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Child Custody and Jurisdiction / Interlocutory Application for Stay Pending Foreign Jurisdiction Determination
- Outcome
- Stay granted
- Legal Topics
- Child Custody, Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens, International Child Abduction, Hague Convention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D. F.
Applicant
E. M.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Child Custody and Jurisdiction / Interlocutory Application for Stay Pending Foreign Jurisdiction Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Irish proceedings regarding child custody should be stayed pending determination of jurisdiction by the Rhode Island court
- 2 Whether the matter is properly characterized as a Hague Convention application
- 3 Whether there is a wrongful retention of the children under the Hague Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The Irish proceedings are stayed pending the Rhode Island court's determination of whether it has and will assume jurisdiction over the custody, access, and living arrangements of the children, as the jurisdictional question is logically prior and must be resolved before any further substantive hearing in Ireland.
Court Disposition
Stay granted
Orders
- Stay of further proceedings in the Irish courts pending the determination by the Court of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations of the question of jurisdiction over the custody, access, and living arrangements of the children.
- Matter adjourned for mention; liberty to apply for further directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment