DH v KC (Approved) [2021] IEHC 579 (13 May 2021)

DH v KC (Approved) [2021] IEHC 579 (13 May 2021)

The court found the mother to be the primary carer, the child thriving in her care, and no evidence of risk to the child's welfare. The mother has strong family support and childcare options in the UK, and the child's best interests are served by permitting relocation with regulated access for the father. Allegations against the mother were rejected as irrelevant or unsubstantiated. The best interests of the child require meaningful relationships with both parents, but relocation is not precluded if access can be maintained.

Citation
[2021] IEHC 579
Parties
Applicant: D. H.; Respondent: K. C.
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
13 May 2021
Procedural Posture
Family Law Relocation Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Relocation of Child, Best Interests of Child, Access Rights, Maintenance, Guardianship
Family Law Child Custody Guardianship Relocation of Child Best Interests of Child Access Rights Maintenance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D. H.

Applicant

K. C.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Law Relocation Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Should the applicant mother be granted liberty to relocate the child to the United Kingdom?
  2. 2 What access arrangements should be made for the respondent father?
  3. 3 What maintenance and guardianship orders are appropriate?

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the mother to be the primary carer, the child thriving in her care, and no evidence of risk to the child's welfare. The mother has strong family support and childcare options in the UK, and the child's best interests are served by permitting relocation with regulated access for the father. Allegations against the mother were rejected as irrelevant or unsubstantiated. The best interests of the child require meaningful relationships with both parents, but relocation is not precluded if access can be maintained.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Liberty granted to applicant mother to relocate the child to the United Kingdom pending further order.
  • Order declaring respondent father to be a guardian of the child.