D.J. v M.K.J. [2013] IEHC 640 (31 July 2013)
The applicant is entitled to a partial variation of the lump sum payment due to financial pressures, but the court will not substantially interfere with comprehensive prior orders; the sum due on 9th June 2013 is reduced and payment dates extended.
- Citation
- [2013] IEHC 640
- Parties
- Applicant: D. J.; Respondent: M. K. J.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Proceedings / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Decree of divorce granted; partial variation of lump sum payment; extension of payment dates; mutual s.18(10) orders.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Variation of Financial Orders, Maintenance, Judicial Separation, Pension Adjustment, Property Transfer
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D. J.
Applicant
M. K. J.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Proceedings / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether financial orders from judicial separation should be varied due to changed circumstances
- 2 Whether proper provision was made for respondent and children
- 3 Whether applicant's financial circumstances justify variation of lump sum payments
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is entitled to a partial variation of the lump sum payment due to financial pressures, but the court will not substantially interfere with comprehensive prior orders; the sum due on 9th June 2013 is reduced and payment dates extended.
Court Disposition
Decree of divorce granted; partial variation of lump sum payment; extension of payment dates; mutual s.18(10) orders.
Orders
- Sum of €135,000 due on 9th June 2013 varied to €67,500.
- Payment of €67,500 extended to 1st April 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment