K v. Crowley [2002] IESC 66 (09 October 2002)
Section 4(3) of the Domestic Violence Act, 1996 is unconstitutional insofar as it permits ex parte interim barring orders of indefinite duration without a fixed, short time limit, thereby depriving respondents of the protection of audi alteram partem in a disproportionate, unreasonable, and unnecessary manner.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] IESC 66
- Parties
- Applicant: D. K.; Respondent: Judge Timothy Crowley; Respondents: Ireland and the Attorney General; Notice Party: The Director of Public Prosecutions; Notice Party: L. K.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Domestic Violence, Interim Barring Orders, Natural Justice, Audi Alteram Partem, Proportionality, Ex Parte Proceedings, Constitutionality of Legislation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D. K.
Applicant
Judge Timothy Crowley
Respondent
Ireland and the Attorney General
Respondents
The Director of Public Prosecutions
Notice Party
L. K.
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Supreme Court Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether s.4(1), (2), and (3) of the Domestic Violence Act, 1996 are unconstitutional for failing to provide fair procedures and adequate protection of the respondent's rights, particularly in relation to ex parte interim barring orders.
Ratio Decidendi
Section 4(3) of the Domestic Violence Act, 1996 is unconstitutional insofar as it permits ex parte interim barring orders of indefinite duration without a fixed, short time limit, thereby depriving respondents of the protection of audi alteram partem in a disproportionate, unreasonable, and unnecessary manner.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the High Court set aside
- Declaration that s.4(3) of the Domestic Violence Act, 1996 is invalid having regard to the Constitution
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment