M. -v- F. [2011] IEHC 415 (27 May 2011)
A marriage contracted in Zimbabwe according to local law and between parties domiciled there, which is de facto monogamous, must be recognised for the purposes of family reunification under Irish law, applying private international law principles. The Minister cannot require a declaration under s. 29 of the Family Law Act 1995 as a precondition for family reunification. The refusal to recognise the marriage solely because it is potentially polygamous is incorrect.
- Citation
- [2011] IEHC 415
- Parties
- Applicant: D. M.; Respondent: C. F.; Notice Party/appellant: The Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Circuit Family Court / High Court Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal refused; Circuit Court declaration upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Recognition of Foreign Marriages, Family Reunification, Customary Marriages, Polygamy and Public Policy, Refugee Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D. M.
Applicant
C. F.
Respondent
The Attorney General
Notice Party/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Circuit Family Court / High Court Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a customary marriage contracted in Zimbabwe, potentially polygamous but de facto monogamous, is valid and entitled to recognition for family reunification under Irish law
- 2 Whether the Minister for Justice can require a declaration under s. 29 of the Family Law Act 1995 as a precondition for family reunification
- 3 Whether Irish public policy prohibits recognition of such marriages for the limited purpose of family reunification
Ratio Decidendi
A marriage contracted in Zimbabwe according to local law and between parties domiciled there, which is de facto monogamous, must be recognised for the purposes of family reunification under Irish law, applying private international law principles. The Minister cannot require a declaration under s. 29 of the Family Law Act 1995 as a precondition for family reunification. The refusal to recognise the marriage solely because it is potentially polygamous is incorrect.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused; Circuit Court declaration upheld.
Orders
- Declaration that the applicant's marriage to the respondent in Zimbabwe on 25th April, 1998, was and is a valid marriage for the purposes of family reunification.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment