D v D (No. 2) (Approved) [2023] IEHC 414 (14 July 2023)
Committal is refused because respondent's bankruptcy constitutes credible evidence of inability to pay, and applicant has not pursued other enforcement methods. Serious misconduct is present, but coercive purpose of contempt cannot be achieved given current financial circumstances.
- Citation
- [2023] IEHC 414
- Parties
- Applicant: D; Respondent: D(2)
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Separation and Family Law / Post Judgment Enforcement Application
- Outcome
- Application for committal refused
- Legal Topics
- Maintenance Enforcement, Bankruptcy Impact on Maintenance, Attachment and Committal, Variation of Maintenance, Transfer of Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D
Applicant
D(2)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Separation and Family Law / Post Judgment Enforcement Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether respondent's non-compliance with maintenance and property transfer orders warrants attachment and committal
- 2 Effect of bankruptcy on enforcement of maintenance and lump sum orders
- 3 Proper procedure for variation of maintenance
Ratio Decidendi
Committal is refused because respondent's bankruptcy constitutes credible evidence of inability to pay, and applicant has not pursued other enforcement methods. Serious misconduct is present, but coercive purpose of contempt cannot be achieved given current financial circumstances.
Court Disposition
Application for committal refused
Orders
- Application for attachment moot due to respondent's attendance
- Application for committal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment