Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited & Anor [2016] IEHC 414 (19 July 2016)
Applicants for amicus curiae status must demonstrate a bona fide interest, the ability to bring a perspective or expertise not otherwise available to the court, and must not seek to involve themselves in factual disputes. In these proceedings, given the absence of factual dispute and the public law dimension, the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] IEHC 414
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Data Protection Commissioner; Defendant: Facebook Ireland Limited; Defendant: Maximillian Schrems
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Admission of Amici Curiae in Data Protection Proceedings / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Applications for admission as amici curiae granted in part and refused in part.
- Legal Topics
- Standard Contractual Clauses, Transfer of Personal Data, Amicus Curiae, Adequacy of Data Protection, Article 7, 8, 47 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Data Protection Commissioner
Plaintiff
Facebook Ireland Limited
Defendant
Maximillian Schrems
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Admission of Amici Curiae in Data Protection Proceedings / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants should be admitted as amici curiae in proceedings concerning the validity of standard contractual clauses for data transfers from the EU to the US
- 2 Whether the applicants can provide assistance or perspectives not otherwise available to the court
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants for amicus curiae status must demonstrate a bona fide interest, the ability to bring a perspective or expertise not otherwise available to the court, and must not seek to involve themselves in factual disputes. In these proceedings, given the absence of factual dispute and the public law dimension, the court exercised its discretion to admit certain applicants as amici curiae who could provide relevant expertise or perspectives, while refusing others whose contributions would be duplicative or not sufficiently distinct.
Court Disposition
Applications for admission as amici curiae granted in part and refused in part.
Orders
- United States of America, Electronic Privacy Information Centre (EPIC), BSA Business Software Alliance, and Digital Europe admitted as amici curiae.
- Applications of Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), Irish Council for Civil Liberties and American Civil Liberties Union, Mr. Kevin Cahill, IBEC Limited, and Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment