Fennelly v O'Doherty [2020] IECA 35 (26 February 2020)
David Fennelly had no standing to appeal the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal decision because the application was made on behalf of Thomas Fennelly, who alone had the right to appeal under section 7(12A) of the Solicitors (Amendment) Act 1960. The statutory language and relevant case law do not permit appeals by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] IECA 35
- Parties
- Appellant: David Fennelly; Respondent: Adrian O'Doherty
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Standing, Right of Audience, Appeals From Disciplinary Tribunal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Fennelly
Appellant
Adrian O'Doherty
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether David Fennelly had standing to appeal the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal decision to the High Court and Court of Appeal
- 2 Interpretation of 'person who has made an application' under section 7(12A) of the Solicitors (Amendment) Act 1960
Ratio Decidendi
David Fennelly had no standing to appeal the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal decision because the application was made on behalf of Thomas Fennelly, who alone had the right to appeal under section 7(12A) of the Solicitors (Amendment) Act 1960. The statutory language and relevant case law do not permit appeals by persons acting on behalf of others unless they are the actual applicant.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order of the President of the High Court affirmed
- Appellant has no standing to pursue appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment