Gunning -v- Coillte Teoranta [2015] IEHC 44 (06 February 2015)
Section 36 of the Forestry Act 1988 does not permit retrospective forfeiture of accrued remuneration; no valid directive was issued with the consent of the Minister for Finance; plaintiff is entitled to payment of earned bonuses.
- Citation
- [2015] IEHC 44
- Parties
- Plaintiff: David Gunning; Defendant: Coillte Teoranta
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Performance Related Pay, Retrospective Forfeiture, Ministerial Directives, Statutory Interpretation, Property Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
David Gunning
Plaintiff
Coillte Teoranta
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a ministerial directive under s.36 of the Forestry Act 1988 can retrospectively forfeit accrued performance-related bonuses
- 2 Whether the defendant was legally precluded from paying the plaintiff's earned bonuses
Ratio Decidendi
Section 36 of the Forestry Act 1988 does not permit retrospective forfeiture of accrued remuneration; no valid directive was issued with the consent of the Minister for Finance; plaintiff is entitled to payment of earned bonuses.
Court Disposition
Judgment for plaintiff
Orders
- Defendant to pay plaintiff €299,001 in performance-related bonuses
- Defendant to pay 2% interest on the sum due
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment