D.P.P. (People) v. Larkin [2008] IECCA 89 (16 June 2008)
The identification evidence was admissible and sufficiently reliable for the jury to assess; the trial judge acted properly in both evidentiary rulings and sentencing; the sentence imposed was appropriate but nine months suspended due to applicant's personal circumstances.
- Citation
- [2008] IECCA 89
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions; Applicant: David Larkin
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal and Sentencing
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal sentence granted; sentence varied.
- Legal Topics
- Identification Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Sentencing, Assault Causing Harm
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Prosecutor
David Larkin
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal and Sentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 Admissibility of identification evidence
- 2 Quality of identification evidence
- 3 Appropriateness of trial judge's directions
Ratio Decidendi
The identification evidence was admissible and sufficiently reliable for the jury to assess; the trial judge acted properly in both evidentiary rulings and sentencing; the sentence imposed was appropriate but nine months suspended due to applicant's personal circumstances.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal sentence granted; sentence varied.
Orders
- Five-year sentence imposed for assault causing harm under section 3 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997.
- Last nine months of sentence suspended on condition applicant enters bond to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for two years from release.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment