D.P.P. (People) v. Larkin [2008] IECCA 89 (16 June 2008)

D.P.P. (People) v. Larkin [2008] IECCA 89 (16 June 2008)

The identification evidence was admissible and sufficiently reliable for the jury to assess; the trial judge acted properly in both evidentiary rulings and sentencing; the sentence imposed was appropriate but nine months suspended due to applicant's personal circumstances.

Citation
[2008] IECCA 89
Parties
Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions; Applicant: David Larkin
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
16 June 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal and Sentencing
Outcome
Leave to appeal sentence granted; sentence varied.
Legal Topics
Identification Evidence, Admissibility of Evidence, Sentencing, Assault Causing Harm

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions

Prosecutor

David Larkin

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal and Sentencing

  1. 1 Admissibility of identification evidence
  2. 2 Quality of identification evidence
  3. 3 Appropriateness of trial judge's directions

Ratio Decidendi

The identification evidence was admissible and sufficiently reliable for the jury to assess; the trial judge acted properly in both evidentiary rulings and sentencing; the sentence imposed was appropriate but nine months suspended due to applicant's personal circumstances.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal sentence granted; sentence varied.

Orders

  • Five-year sentence imposed for assault causing harm under section 3 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997.
  • Last nine months of sentence suspended on condition applicant enters bond to keep the peace and be of good behaviour for two years from release.