Murphy v Foley (Approved) [2023] IEHC 737 (20 December 2023)

The defendant, being entirely successful, is entitled to an order for costs against the plaintiff without a stay, as no circumstances justify departure from the normal rule and the plaintiff failed to discharge the onus of proving that interests of justice require a stay.

Citation: [2023] IEHC 737
Parties: Plaintiff: David Murphy; Defendant: Denis Foley
Jurisdiction: Ireland
Judgment Date: 20 December 2023
Procedural Posture: Civil / Costs Ruling Following Dismissal of Claim
Outcome: Plaintiff's claim dismissed as statute-barred; costs awarded to defendant without stay.
Legal Topics: Statute of Limitations, Costs, Professional Negligence, Estoppel

Civil Procedure Statute of Limitations Costs Professional Negligence Estoppel

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2

Parties

David Murphy

Plaintiff

Denis Foley

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Costs Ruling Following Dismissal of Claim

Legal Issues

1 Whether costs should follow the event after dismissal of a statute-barred claim
2 Whether a stay should be placed on the costs order pending related professional negligence proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim dismissed as statute-barred; costs awarded to defendant without stay.

Orders

Order dismissing plaintiff's claim
Order for costs of proceedings, including present application, against plaintiff, to include all reserved costs, adjudicated in default of agreement, without a stay