O'Sullivan v A Company (No.1) (Approved) [2020] IEHC 335 (22 June 2020)
The court is satisfied that all statutory and jurisdictional prerequisites for orders under s. 902A are met, including authorisation, written consent, reasonable grounds, and appropriateness of discretion. There is a strong public interest in international cooperation on tax matters. Orders compelling the respondent...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] IEHC 335
- Parties
- Applicant: David O'Sullivan; Respondent: A Company
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Notice of Motion / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- orders granted
- Legal Topics
- Exchange of Information, Double Taxation, Mutual Administrative Assistance, Procedural Requirements, In Camera Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David O'Sullivan
Applicant
A Company
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Notice of Motion / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant orders under s. 902A Taxes Consolidation Act 1997 compelling the respondent to furnish information to the Revenue Commissioners for foreign tax authorities
- 2 Whether the procedural and jurisdictional prerequisites for such orders are satisfied
- 3 Whether the proceedings should be held in camera and the extent of respondent's obligations regarding disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The court is satisfied that all statutory and jurisdictional prerequisites for orders under s. 902A are met, including authorisation, written consent, reasonable grounds, and appropriateness of discretion. There is a strong public interest in international cooperation on tax matters. Orders compelling the respondent to furnish the requested information are granted, with procedural clarifications and dispensation with formal amendment of the notice of motion.
Court Disposition
orders granted
Orders
- Orders under s. 902A compelling the respondent to furnish information to the applicant as adjusted by later affidavits and oral evidence in each case.
- Respondent has liberty to refer to the existence, but not the terms, of the order for responding to queries from affected individuals, regulators, or law enforcement authorities.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment