Patton & Anor -v- Tee Pigs Ltd [2013] IEHC 345 (11 July 2013)
The court found that the sums claimed by the plaintiffs, as assignees of David Patton Ltd., were validly due from Tee Pigs Limited and had not been discharged by payment or otherwise. The evidence, including audited accounts and credible witness testimony, established the debt. Defences of payment, waiver, estoppel, and mistake were rejected as unsupported by evidence or inapplicable in law.
- Citation
- [2013] IEHC 345
- Parties
- Plaintiff: David Patton; Plaintiff: Robert Patton; Defendant: Tee Pigs Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 11 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Debt Recovery, Intercompany Accounts, Share Purchase Agreement, Mistake, Estoppel, Waiver
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Patton
Plaintiff
Robert Patton
Plaintiff
Tee Pigs Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Tee Pigs Limited is indebted to David Patton Ltd. (assigned to the plaintiffs) for sums arising from intercompany transactions and feed supply.
- 2 Whether the debt was discharged by payment or otherwise extinguished by operation of law (waiver, estoppel, mistake).
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sums claimed by the plaintiffs, as assignees of David Patton Ltd., were validly due from Tee Pigs Limited and had not been discharged by payment or otherwise. The evidence, including audited accounts and credible witness testimony, established the debt. Defences of payment, waiver, estoppel, and mistake were rejected as unsupported by evidence or inapplicable in law.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiffs
Orders
- Decree for the plaintiffs in the sum of £192,014.61 against Tee Pigs Limited.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment