D.P.P. v. Syron [2001] IEHC 40; [2001] 2 IR 105 (7th March, 2001)

D.P.P. v. Syron [2001] IEHC 40; [2001] 2 IR 105 (7th March, 2001)

The absence of regulations specifying the scientific formulation or calculation method for breath samples does not preclude conviction where the statutory certificate is produced in compliance with Section 17 of the Road Traffic Act, 1994. The certificate is prima facie evidence of the facts stated unless rebutted, and the accused retains the right to challenge its accuracy or provenance.

Citation
[2001] 2 IR 105
Parties
Prosecutor: Director of Public Prosecutions; Respondent: David Syron
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Consultative Case Stated From District Court to High Court
Outcome
question answered in favour of prosecution
Legal Topics
Breath Alcohol Testing, Evidentiary Requirements, Regulatory Compliance, Constitutional Rights
Criminal Law Road Traffic Law Breath Alcohol Testing Evidentiary Requirements Regulatory Compliance Constitutional Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions

Prosecutor

David Syron

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Consultative Case Stated From District Court to High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a conviction can be sustained for a breath alcohol offence in the absence of regulations specifying the scientific formulation or calculation method for breath samples under the Road Traffic Act, 1994

Ratio Decidendi

The absence of regulations specifying the scientific formulation or calculation method for breath samples does not preclude conviction where the statutory certificate is produced in compliance with Section 17 of the Road Traffic Act, 1994. The certificate is prima facie evidence of the facts stated unless rebutted, and the accused retains the right to challenge its accuracy or provenance.

Court Disposition

question answered in favour of prosecution

Orders

  • District Judge is entitled to convict in the absence of regulations specifying scientific formulation or calculation method for breath samples under the Road Traffic Act, 1994