Mr & Mrs X and the Defence Forces [2014] IEIC 130313 (13 June 2014)
The notes taken by the army officers at the Coroner's inquest are not privileged as they are mere transcripts of public proceedings and do not contain confidential legal advice or original composition; therefore, section 22(1)(a) does not justify refusal of access.
- Citation
- [2014] IEIC 130313
- Parties
- Applicants: Mr & Mrs X; Respondent: Defence Forces
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- FOI Review Application / Final Decision by Information Commissioner
- Outcome
- Defence Forces' refusal annulled; records to be released
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Public Records, Disclosure of Inquest Notes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr & Mrs X
Applicants
Defence Forces
Respondent
Procedural Posture
FOI Review Application / Final Decision by Information Commissioner
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether notes taken by army legal officers at a Coroner's inquest are exempt from disclosure under section 22(1)(a) of the FOI Act due to legal professional privilege
Ratio Decidendi
The notes taken by the army officers at the Coroner's inquest are not privileged as they are mere transcripts of public proceedings and do not contain confidential legal advice or original composition; therefore, section 22(1)(a) does not justify refusal of access.
Court Disposition
Defence Forces' refusal annulled; records to be released
Orders
- Release the remainder of Records A and B to the applicants
- If requested, provide a transcript of the remainder of Records A and B to the applicants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment