Defender Ltd -v- HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ireland) DAC & ors [2018] IEHC 322 (01 June 2018)

Defender Ltd -v- HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ireland) DAC & ors [2018] IEHC 322 (01 June 2018)

The Court sustained Defender's objections only in relation to interrogatories that should have been addressed to Reliance companies and those that sought answers on matters of law. All other objections were rejected. The Court found that interrogatories are a valuable tool for efficient case management and should be...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] IEHC 322
Parties
Plaintiff: Defender Limited; Defendant: HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ireland) DAC; Third Party: Reliance Management (BVI) Limited; Third Party: Firman Limited; Third Party: David Whitehead; Third Party: Reliance International Research LLC
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
01 June 2018
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Civil Action / Interlocutory Application Regarding Interrogatories and Pre Trial Directions
Outcome
Two of Defender's seven objections to interrogatories sustained; remaining objections rejected. Court will hear parties on precise terms of orders. HSBC's request to vary pre-trial directions granted, subject to further submissions on timing.
Legal Topics
Interrogatories, Discovery, Pre Trial Directions, Costs, Case Management
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Interrogatories Discovery Pre Trial Directions Costs Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Defender Limited

Plaintiff

HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ireland) DAC

Defendant

Reliance Management (BVI) Limited

Third Party

Firman Limited

Third Party

David Whitehead

Third Party

Reliance International Research LLC

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Civil Action / Interlocutory Application Regarding Interrogatories and Pre Trial Directions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Defender Limited must answer certain interrogatories served by HSBC
  2. 2 Whether interrogatories relating to third parties, interpretation of documents, admitted documents, corporate awareness, matters of law, witness statements, and disputed terms are permissible
  3. 3 Whether pre-trial directions should be varied due to delays in answering interrogatories

Ratio Decidendi

The Court sustained Defender's objections only in relation to interrogatories that should have been addressed to Reliance companies and those that sought answers on matters of law. All other objections were rejected. The Court found that interrogatories are a valuable tool for efficient case management and should be permitted unless they are unnecessary, irrelevant, or would cause injustice. The Court also found merit in HSBC's request to vary pre-trial directions due to Defender's unjustified refusal to answer certain interrogatories.

Court Disposition

Two of Defender's seven objections to interrogatories sustained; remaining objections rejected. Court will hear parties on precise terms of orders. HSBC's request to vary pre-trial directions granted, subject to further submissions on timing.

Orders

  • Defender not required to answer interrogatories properly addressed to Reliance companies or those seeking answers on matters of law.
  • Defender required to answer remaining interrogatories.