Garda Representative Association & anor -v- Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform [2016] IECA 18 (02 February 2016)
The Minister, in making the Public Service Management (Sick Leave) Regulations 2014, was exercising a delegated legislative power of general application and was not legally obliged to consult with the Garda Representative Association or its members prior to making the regulations. No legitimate expectation of consultation was established, and the process followed did not render the regulations ultra vires or invalid.
- Citation
- [2016] IECA 18
- Parties
- Appellant/applicant: Garda Representative Association; Appellant/applicant: Amy Bourke; Respondent/respondent: Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Delegated Legislation, Legitimate Expectation, Duty to Consult, Public Sector Employment, Judicial Review, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Garda Representative Association
Appellant/applicant
Amy Bourke
Appellant/applicant
Minister for Public Expenditure and Reform
Respondent/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Minister was obliged to consult with the Garda Representative Association before making the Public Service Management (Sick Leave) Regulations 2014
- 2 Whether the applicants had a legitimate expectation of consultation
- 3 Whether the Minister failed to take relevant considerations into account or took into account irrelevant considerations
Ratio Decidendi
The Minister, in making the Public Service Management (Sick Leave) Regulations 2014, was exercising a delegated legislative power of general application and was not legally obliged to consult with the Garda Representative Association or its members prior to making the regulations. No legitimate expectation of consultation was established, and the process followed did not render the regulations ultra vires or invalid.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order affirmed
- Cross-appeal on costs dismissed; original costs order stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment