Prendergast & Anor -v- Joyce & Ors [2009] IEHC 199 (13 February 2009)

Prendergast & Anor -v- Joyce & Ors [2009] IEHC 199 (13 February 2009)

The court found that Monica Joyce was elderly, mentally impaired, and vulnerable at the time of the transfer, and that the relationship and circumstances gave rise to a presumption of undue influence. The defendant failed to rebut this presumption, as Monica did not receive adequate independent advice and was not shown to have understood the nature and effect of the transaction. The transfer was therefore set aside for presumed undue influence.

Citation
[2009] IEHC 199
Parties
Plaintiffs: Kevin Prendergast and Monica Joyce (suing by her niece and next friend Evelyn Prendergast); Defendant: Dermot Joyce; Defendant (withdrawn): The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland; Defendant (withdrawn): Allied Irish Banks plc
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
13 February 2009
Procedural Posture
High Court Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Transfer set aside for presumed undue influence; funds to revert to Monica Joyce's estate.
Legal Topics
Undue Influence, Resulting Trusts, Joint Bank Accounts, Mental Capacity, Independent Legal Advice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kevin Prendergast and Monica Joyce (suing by her niece and next friend Evelyn Prendergast)

Plaintiffs

Dermot Joyce

Defendant

The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland

Defendant (withdrawn)

Allied Irish Banks plc

Defendant (withdrawn)

Procedural Posture

High Court Civil / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the transfer of funds by Monica Joyce to a joint account with Dermot Joyce should be set aside for presumed undue influence
  2. 2 Whether the presumption of undue influence arises in the relationship between Monica Joyce and Dermot Joyce
  3. 3 Whether the presumption of undue influence was rebutted by evidence of independent advice or Monica Joyce's capacity

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Monica Joyce was elderly, mentally impaired, and vulnerable at the time of the transfer, and that the relationship and circumstances gave rise to a presumption of undue influence. The defendant failed to rebut this presumption, as Monica did not receive adequate independent advice and was not shown to have understood the nature and effect of the transaction. The transfer was therefore set aside for presumed undue influence.

Court Disposition

Transfer set aside for presumed undue influence; funds to revert to Monica Joyce's estate.

Orders

  • The transfer of funds by Monica Joyce to the joint accounts with Dermot Joyce is set aside.
  • The sums in question are to be held for the benefit of Monica Joyce's estate.