D.P.P. v. Devlin [1998] IEHC 139 (2nd September, 1998)

D.P.P. v. Devlin [1998] IEHC 139 (2nd September, 1998)

District Judge erred in law by dismissing the charge solely on the basis of breaches of Custody Regulations without adjudicating on actual prejudice or impact on admissibility of evidence; failure to orally inform and dual roles do not automatically entitle dismissal absent findings of prejudice.

Citation
[1998] IEHC 139
Parties
Appellant: Director of Public Prosecutions; Respondent: Patrick Devlin
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Case Stated / High Court Review of District Court Dismissal
Outcome
District Judge's dismissal of charge was incorrect in law; questions answered in the negative; matter remitted for findings in accordance with law.
Legal Topics
Drunk Driving, Custody Regulations, Admissibility of Evidence, Procedural Fairness
Criminal Law Road Traffic Law Administrative Law Drunk Driving Custody Regulations Admissibility of Evidence Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Director of Public Prosecutions

Appellant

Patrick Devlin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Case Stated / High Court Review of District Court Dismissal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether failure to orally inform respondent of rights under Regulation 8 of Custody Regulations entitles dismissal of charge
  2. 2 Whether Garda Dillon's dual role as arresting/investigating officer and member in charge breaches Regulation 4(3) and entitles dismissal

Ratio Decidendi

District Judge erred in law by dismissing the charge solely on the basis of breaches of Custody Regulations without adjudicating on actual prejudice or impact on admissibility of evidence; failure to orally inform and dual roles do not automatically entitle dismissal absent findings of prejudice.

Court Disposition

District Judge's dismissal of charge was incorrect in law; questions answered in the negative; matter remitted for findings in accordance with law.

Orders

  • District Judge to make findings on prejudice and impact in accordance with statute, regulations, and case law.