Brooks Thomas Ltd. v. Impac Ltd. [1998] IESC 18; [1999] 1 ILRM 171 (29th July, 1998)
Further discovery of the handbooks, guidebooks, and standard reference works is not necessary for disposing fairly of the action or for saving costs, as the respondents already have detailed knowledge of the alleged breaches and relevant documents have been discovered.
- Citation
- [1999] 1 ILRM 171
- Parties
- Defendant/appellant: Impac International Ltd.; Plaintiff/respondent: O'Malley & Sons Ltd.
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order for Further Discovery
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; High Court order for further discovery reversed; motion for further discovery dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Discovery, Breach of Contract, Negligence, Misrepresentation, Confidentiality, Trade Secrets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Impac International Ltd.
Defendant/appellant
O'Malley & Sons Ltd.
Plaintiff/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order for Further Discovery
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether further discovery of handbooks, guidebooks, and standard reference works indicating the appellant's approach to management consultancy/engineering is necessary for disposing fairly of the action or for saving costs
Ratio Decidendi
Further discovery of the handbooks, guidebooks, and standard reference works is not necessary for disposing fairly of the action or for saving costs, as the respondents already have detailed knowledge of the alleged breaches and relevant documents have been discovered.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; High Court order for further discovery reversed; motion for further discovery dismissed.
Orders
- Order of the High Court for further discovery reversed.
- Motion for further discovery dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment