McGuinness v Wilkie and Flanagan Solicitors (Approved) [2020] IECA 111 (13 January 2020)
The appeal was dismissed because the plaintiff's delays in prosecuting the claim were both inordinate and inexcusable, resulting in significant prejudice to the defendant and rendering a fair trial impossible. The High Court correctly applied the established legal principles on delay and the balance of justice favoured dismissal.
- Citation
- [2020] IECA 111
- Parties
- Appellant/plaintiff: Charles McGuinness; Respondent/defendant: Wilkie and Flanagan Solicitors
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order Striking Out Proceedings for Delay
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dismissal for Delay, Limitation of Actions, Prejudice to Fair Trial, Professional Indemnity, Oral Partnership Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles McGuinness
Appellant/plaintiff
Wilkie and Flanagan Solicitors
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order Striking Out Proceedings for Delay
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the plaintiff's claim for inordinate and inexcusable delay
- 2 Whether the delay prejudiced the defendant's ability to have a fair trial
- 3 Whether new evidence or arguments could be introduced on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the plaintiff's delays in prosecuting the claim were both inordinate and inexcusable, resulting in significant prejudice to the defendant and rendering a fair trial impossible. The High Court correctly applied the established legal principles on delay and the balance of justice favoured dismissal.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; High Court order striking out proceedings affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment