Unisolutions/Dascom/Manix [1998] IECA 533 (19th November, 1998)
The non-exclusive distribution agreement, including the post-term non-compete clause, is necessary to protect Unisolutions' intellectual property and facilitate transfer of know-how. It does not restrict competition within the meaning of Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
- Citation
- [1998] IECA 533
- Parties
- Originator: Unisolutions Associates; Distributor: Dascom Services Ltd; Distributor: Manix Systems Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Authority Decision / Final Decision
- Outcome
- certificate issued
- Legal Topics
- Distribution Agreements, Non Compete Clauses, Intellectual Property Protection, Computer Software Licensing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unisolutions Associates
Originator
Dascom Services Ltd
Distributor
Manix Systems Ltd
Distributor
Procedural Posture
Competition Authority Decision / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the non-exclusive distribution agreement contravenes Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991
- 2 Whether post-term non-compete clauses restrict competition
- 3 Protection of intellectual property in software distribution
Ratio Decidendi
The non-exclusive distribution agreement, including the post-term non-compete clause, is necessary to protect Unisolutions' intellectual property and facilitate transfer of know-how. It does not restrict competition within the meaning of Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Court Disposition
certificate issued
Orders
- The Competition Authority certifies that the agreement dated 9 December 1992 between Unisolutions Associates and Dascom Services Limited and Manix Systems Limited does not contravene Section 4(1) of the Competition Act, 1991.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment