T.D.I. Metro Ltd. v. Delap [2000] IESC 53 (31st March, 2000)
The Attorney General does not have a general right to intervene in any proceedings but may be joined as a party at the appeal stage where there is a clear public interest, such as the prosecution of offences by statutory bodies, and where the court, in its discretion, considers it appropriate. In this case, the public interest in the prosecution of offences and the Attorney General's constitutional role justify his joinder for the appeal.
- Citation
- [2000] IESC 53
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: TDI Metro Limited; Applicant/respondent: Patrick Halligan; Respondent: District Judge Delap; Notice Party/appellant: Fingal County Council; Intervener: Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review and Appeal / Supreme Court Motion to Intervene on Appeal
- Outcome
- Attorney General granted liberty to intervene and joined as a party to the appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Prosecution of Offences, Attorney General's Role, Statutory Interpretation, Public Interest Intervention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
TDI Metro Limited
Applicant/respondent
Patrick Halligan
Applicant/respondent
District Judge Delap
Respondent
Fingal County Council
Notice Party/appellant
Attorney General
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review and Appeal / Supreme Court Motion to Intervene on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Attorney General should be granted liberty to intervene and be joined as a party at the appeal stage in proceedings concerning the prosecution of indictable offences by a local authority.
- 2 Whether the Attorney General has a general entitlement to intervene in proceedings where issues of public concern arise.
Ratio Decidendi
The Attorney General does not have a general right to intervene in any proceedings but may be joined as a party at the appeal stage where there is a clear public interest, such as the prosecution of offences by statutory bodies, and where the court, in its discretion, considers it appropriate. In this case, the public interest in the prosecution of offences and the Attorney General's constitutional role justify his joinder for the appeal.
Court Disposition
Attorney General granted liberty to intervene and joined as a party to the appeal.
Orders
- Attorney General joined as a notice party to the proceedings for the purposes of the appeal.
- Attorney General to abide his own costs and, at the court's discretion, some or all of the costs of other parties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment