Logue v. Redmond [1999] IEHC 220; [1999] 2 ILRM 498 (4th March, 1999)

Logue v. Redmond [1999] IEHC 220; [1999] 2 ILRM 498 (4th March, 1999)

Except for documents 15 and 20, which contain legal advice and are privileged, all other documents in the three categories are not privileged and must be disclosed. The balancing exercise favors disclosure as public interest grounds do not justify non-disclosure in this case.

Citation
[1999] 2 ILRM 498
Parties
Plaintiff: Donal Logue; Defendant: Sergeant D Redmond; Defendant: Garda Kealy
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Motion for Inspection and Disclosure of Documents
Outcome
Motion granted in part
Legal Topics
Discovery, Legal Professional Privilege, Public Interest Immunity, False Imprisonment, Defamation, Wrongful Arrest

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Donal Logue

Plaintiff

Sergeant D Redmond

Defendant

Garda Kealy

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Motion for Inspection and Disclosure of Documents

  1. 1 Whether documents claimed as privileged by the Defendants should be disclosed to the Plaintiff
  2. 2 Whether legal professional privilege and public interest immunity apply to documents exchanged between Gardai and the Director of Public Prosecutions
  3. 3 Whether internal Garda memoranda and investigation files are privileged

Ratio Decidendi

Except for documents 15 and 20, which contain legal advice and are privileged, all other documents in the three categories are not privileged and must be disclosed. The balancing exercise favors disclosure as public interest grounds do not justify non-disclosure in this case.

Court Disposition

Motion granted in part

Orders

  • All documents in the three categories except documents 15 and 20 must be disclosed to the Plaintiff