Dr S and Medical Council (FOI Act 2014) [2016] IEIC 160321 (15 December 2016)

Dr S and Medical Council (FOI Act 2014) [2016] IEIC 160321 (15 December 2016)

The two records were confidential communications between the Council and its legal adviser for the purpose of obtaining or giving legal advice and are protected by legal advice privilege; therefore, refusal under section 31(1)(a) was justified.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] IEIC 160321
Parties
Applicant: Dr S; Respondent: Medical Council
Jurisdiction
Ireland
Judgment Date
15 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review
Outcome
Refusal affirmed
Legal Topics
Legal Professional Privilege, Access to Information, FOI Exemptions
Administrative Law Freedom of Information Legal Professional Privilege Access to Information FOI Exemptions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dr S

Applicant

Medical Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review

  1. 1 Whether the Medical Council was justified in refusing to release two records to the applicant under section 31(1)(a) of the FOI Act on the grounds of legal professional privilege

Ratio Decidendi

The two records were confidential communications between the Council and its legal adviser for the purpose of obtaining or giving legal advice and are protected by legal advice privilege; therefore, refusal under section 31(1)(a) was justified.

Court Disposition

Refusal affirmed

Orders

  • Council's decision to refuse access to the two records under section 31(1)(a) of the FOI Act is affirmed