Dr S and Medical Council (FOI Act 2014) [2016] IEIC 160321 (15 December 2016)
The two records were confidential communications between the Council and its legal adviser for the purpose of obtaining or giving legal advice and are protected by legal advice privilege; therefore, refusal under section 31(1)(a) was justified.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] IEIC 160321
- Parties
- Applicant: Dr S; Respondent: Medical Council
- Jurisdiction
- Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review
- Outcome
- Refusal affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Legal Professional Privilege, Access to Information, FOI Exemptions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dr S
Applicant
Medical Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Freedom of Information Review / Decision on Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Medical Council was justified in refusing to release two records to the applicant under section 31(1)(a) of the FOI Act on the grounds of legal professional privilege
Ratio Decidendi
The two records were confidential communications between the Council and its legal adviser for the purpose of obtaining or giving legal advice and are protected by legal advice privilege; therefore, refusal under section 31(1)(a) was justified.
Court Disposition
Refusal affirmed
Orders
- Council's decision to refuse access to the two records under section 31(1)(a) of the FOI Act is affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment